About Natybet

Our editorial policy

• Every published pick is settled in public. Wins and losses both go on the accuracy record. We do not delete losing picks and we do not edit a pick after kick-off.
• Reasoning is always shown. A pick with no stated reasoning is indistinguishable from a guess, so we do not publish them.
• Confidence is stated honestly. When we are barely better than guessing, the confidence marker says so.
• We do not publish what we have not checked. Where we have not verified a paybill, minimum stake or bonus figure, the page says we have not verified it instead of quoting a plausible number. Wrong deposit details cost readers real money.
• No slip is published unresearched. If a round has not been analysed, the page says so rather than showing filler.

What we will never publish

• “Sure wins”, “guaranteed” odds or fixed matches. These do not exist. Every offer of them we have examined in Kenya is a scam, and we explain the mechanics of those scams rather than joining in.
• Crash-game predictors, hacks or signals. They are mathematically impossible and the apps are typically malware. See our page on why.
• Pages designed to look like an operator. Our operator guides carry a clear not-affiliated notice, never imitate an operator's branding, and never show a login or registration form. No page of ours will ever ask for a betting PIN or an M-Pesa PIN, not here and not on Nganya, where M-Pesa asks for your PIN on its own prompt and we never see it.
• Betting framed as income. It is not one. The maths runs the other way, which is how bookmakers exist.

How we make money

Natybet is free to read and earns in exactly two ways, both of which we would rather you knew about before you read anything else.

Commercial links to licensed Kenyan operators. When you open an account through one, we may be paid. Every such link is labelled as a commercial link at the point you see it.

Nganya, our own crash game. It earns the way every crash game earns: a house edge, which over enough rounds returns less than players stake. We are not going to describe that in softer words on our own page than we use for everyone else's: the RTP and house-edge maths we publish applies to Nganya exactly as written.

That is the whole list. We do not sell tips, we do not run a paid or VIP group, and we take no money from readers for anything we publish.

Here is the part that actually matters, because it is the part every affiliate site glosses over. What an operator pays has no effect on how we rank it. Our comparison pages rank on licensing status, M-Pesa deposit and withdrawal reliability, minimum stakes and how heavy the app is on a cheap Android phone, criteria we publish at the top of each page so you can disagree with them. Bonus size is deliberately not a criterion, and neither is commission.

The obvious question is why you should believe that. The honest answer is that you should not simply take our word for it. You should check the work. The criteria are stated openly, the reasoning behind every pick is published, and our accuracy record shows the losses. A site that ranks by commission has to hide its criteria; we would rather hand you the means to catch us.

We also still refuse to publish things that would earn well. Bonus tables with inflated headline figures convert better than an honest explanation of rollover requirements. Predictor content earns very well indeed. We do not publish either, and that is the real test of whether an editorial policy means anything.

The conflict we have, stated plainly

We write about crash games and we run one. That is a real conflict, and the honest thing is to name it rather than hope you do not notice.

What we do about it: Nganya is never entered into our operator rankings or comparison tables, because a company scoring itself against its own competitors is not doing analysis. It is labelled as ours wherever it appears. And the unflattering arithmetic on our crash-game pages (that the house edge cannot be strategised around, that no predictor can work, that the long-run expectation is a loss) is not quietly suspended when the game in question is ours.

What you should do about it: treat anything we write about our own game as interested, and check it. Nganya publishes the commitment for every round before betting opens and the seed that produced it afterwards, so its fairness is the one claim on either property you can verify without trusting us at all. Building it that way was the point.

Who writes this

Analysis is published by The Natybet Desk. Our background is in football research and data analysis rather than tipping, which is probably visible in how much time we spend on what we do not know.

Corrections

If we have published something inaccurate (a wrong paybill, an out-of-date stake limit, a factual error in a guide) please tell us and we will correct it and note the correction. Accuracy on the practical details is the part of this site where a mistake does real damage, so we take reports of it seriously.

Reach us via the contact page.

Regulation

Gambling in Kenya is regulated by the Gambling Regulatory Authority, which replaced the Betting Control and Licensing Board in 2026 under the Gambling Control Act 2025.

Our editorial pages are published as a publisher, not as an operator: nothing we write about Betika, SportPesa, Odibets or anyone else is written on their behalf or with their involvement. Nganya is the part of what we do that is operating, and it is licensed and regulated as such. Its licensing details are published in the game's own footer at play.natybet.com, where you should check them rather than taking this page's word for it.

Apply the same test to everyone, including us. Always confirm that any operator you use is currently licensed; the details should appear in its own site footer, and an operator that will not show you them has told you something useful.